motta80-2 wrote on IMDB:
It is a testament to Peter Morgan's humility and skill as a writer and
Ron Howard's ability to take a based on real events story to which the
outcome is widely known and create a compelling "what will happen"
drama (as he did with Apollo 13) that Frost/Nixon succeeds as a film.
This is a film based on a play that neither felt trapped in staginess
nor weakly expanded with just the stage dialogue delivered exactly but
in a variety of outdoor locales. I have to give Peter Morgan a lot of
credit here. I saw the play in London and wondered throughout
production of the film how they would escape its theatricality. Many
recent films from plays like Proof, Closer, The Producers, have failed
to throw off the shackles of stage feel. Not that all bad films, many
served as a good way to see the play if you hadn't had the chance, but
they weren't necessarily compelling films in their own right. What is
so impressive about Morgan's work here is that in adapting his own play
he has not been precious, he has not tried to enforce his already
successful stage-play onto a film director he has wholly reworked it
from beginning to end and yet retained all the gravity and drama that
the play elicited. If you saw the play everything key is here and yet
you can feel the difference the pacing is changed, the power achieved
in different ways. [ show more ]
For this Howard also deserves credit. To have filmed the play as it was
would have been disastrous on film one long two-hander scene after
another, duelling narrators. And given the reverence the play has
enjoyed a less experienced director could have fallen into this trap or
that of simply changing the settings, but Howard knows when we need
quick cuts, when a long drawn out piece that worked on stage needs to
be reduced to a couple of lines and a post-scene reaction, and when he
needs to hold with a scene and let it play between the two leads. This
happens in several impressive moments in the latter half of the film.
For some this might constitute the films biggest flaw however. Morgan
and Howard can't escape the fact that in the final stages of the film
it is the head-to-head scenes of Frost and Nixon that are key and they
must stay with them more. This is necessary, but it sadly means that
the supporting players, so well established and broadened out to expand
the scope in the first half, fall be the wayside. A superb Toby Jones
as Irving 'Swifty' Lazar, Matthew Macfadyen as John Birt and always
reliable Oliver Platt as Bob Zelnick all but disappear and only Kevin
Bacon and Sam Rockwell play any significant role beyond the two leads
in the final stages. This is a shame. It may best serve the story
creating the sense of claustrophobia necessary to keep you gripped but
it does feel like a film of two halves because of it and it noticeable.
Frank Langella and Michael Sheen are superb, as they were on stage, and
Langella will take a lot of beating for the Oscar this year. There are
many moments here when I was so involved I forgot I wasn't watching the
real Nixon. It's not that he looks that like Nixon but he is so real
you believe it completely and have to remind yourself you're watching
an actor.
Platt is reliably Platt. Bacon is also his typically understated solid
presence doing a lot with little. Toby Jones is fantastic in a small
role instantly memorable; and Rebecca Hall builds on a series of
strong performances. But in the supporting cast it is Rockwell that
stands out. Sure, he has the most to do but he is completely in this
role, he manages to sink into the role which is something he rarely
does. He matches the skill he showed in Lawn Dogs and Confessions Of A
Dangerous Mind here and it is great to see him back at his best.
I thoroughly recommend this film. [ show less ]
Written on IMDB a year ago.